 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| Poll Details |
|
| Poll ID: |
185284 |
Created By: |
mikej
|
| Poll Rating: |
|
| Total Votes: |
5669
(last at Aug 16, 2010 06:33 PM PDT)
|
| Close Date: |
None
|
| Resources: |
|
|
| Add Your Thoughts
[ new comment ]
|
|
| Comment #1 |
from jpmvc
on Oct, 14, 2009, 09:21 PDT [reply] |
|
Even 400 OSO is high for me. Preferred speed most times is 100 or 200. |
| Comment #2 |
from sadim1223
on Oct, 14, 2009, 17:47 PDT [reply] |
|
I realize that you asked for comments to wait until tomorrow, but tomorrow is going to be a long day and I will most likely forget to leave a note. While I see the sense in these types of questions (which pop up in forums with some regularity), I feel that they miss the point of technological advancement. Most people will answer this question from the perspective of, "I made due with X iso (2, 12, or 20) years ago so that's all I need." As I see it, the question shouldn't be, "how good were cameras yesterday," but instead, "how good can they be tomorrow?" I for one welcome the ability to use the fastest shutter speeds possible after the light starts to fade. Why not then ask for the best that the engineers can give us? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
